治理研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 27-38.

• 国家治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

比较视野下的中国治理:分析与反思

敬乂嘉, 任媛媛   

  • 收稿日期:2022-03-28 出版日期:2022-07-15 发布日期:2022-07-27
  • 作者简介:敬乂嘉,复旦大学全球公共政策研究院院长,国际关系与公共事务学院教授;
    任媛媛,复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自科基金创新研究群体项目“中国经济发展规律与治理机制研究”(72121002);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“构建高质量社会领域公共服务体系研究”(21JZD034)

Chinese Governance from a Comparative Perspective: Analysis and Reflections

Jing Yijia, Ren Yuanyuan   

  • Received:2022-03-28 Published:2022-07-15 Online:2022-07-27

摘要:

在中国全力推进国家治理现代化和增强国际话语权的背景下,对中国治理的比较特征和全球价值的正确认知显得尤为重要。文章从国际比较的角度出发,选取在国际上有一定影响力的20项治理指数,分析和比较2000-2020年间中国的评分和排名。结果显示,国际治理指数在该期间对中国治理的整体评价处在中间水平,略有上升;同时存在显著的结构性差异。相关评价一方面反映了中国作为发展中国家所具有的治理供给特征,另一方面也反映了指数设计和运营上存在的局限性。对治理一般性和特殊性的辩证认知,有利于正确理解和使用国际治理指数,以“办好中国事情”和“讲好中国故事”。

关键词: 中国治理, 国际治理指数, 治理, 善治, 国家治理

Abstract:

A correct perception of the comparative characteristics and global values of China’s governance is particularly important to understand its efforts to promote the modernization of national governance and enhance its international discourse power,.This study selected 20 influential governance indices published from 2000 to 2020 to analyze China’s scores and rankings.The analysis shows that the overall evaluation of China by these indices is at a moderate level, with a slight increasing trend.At the same time, there are significant structural differences.This reflects the characteristics of governance supply in China, a developing country, and the limitations in the design and operation of the indices. As this article argues, to successfully “address Chinese issues” and “tell Chinese stories”, international governance indices should be used with the dialectical recognition of the particularity and generality of good governance firmly in mind.

Key words: China’s governance, international governance indices, governance, good governance, national governance

中图分类号: