治理研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 19-32.

• 浙江现象与经验(中宣部哲学社会科学期刊重点专栏) • 上一篇    下一篇

新时代“枫桥经验”驱动基层韧性建设的机制与路径

吴新叶, 汪子策   

  • 收稿日期:2026-02-03 出版日期:2026-07-15 发布日期:2026-09-09
  • 作者简介:吴新叶,同济大学政治与国际关系学院长聘教授、博士生导师,同济大学中国特色社会主义理论研究中心研究员;
    汪子策,同济大学政治与国际关系学院博士研究生,上海市全过程人民民主研究基地研究助理。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲社重大项目“习近平总书记关于构建中国话语和中国叙事体系重要论述研究”(编号:24JZD004)

The Mechanism and Path of Grassroots Resilience Construction Driven by the “Fengqiao Experience” in the New Era

Wu Xinye, Wang Zice   

  • Received:2026-02-03 Published:2026-07-15 Online:2026-09-09

摘要:

新时代“枫桥经验”的落地关键在于制度与组织的互动。纠纷化解是影响基层韧性的重要方面,这可以从实践中常见的纠纷化解类型作出判断:“事本”化解方式聚焦于矛盾识别,推动案结事了,体现出制度化的运转机制,其目标指向是提供行动约束框架和推动社会秩序的实现;而“人本”化解方式则致力于解决“为了谁”的问题,推动案结心了,体现出组织化的运转机制,其目标指向是促进共识达成和社会关系的修复。制度与组织的互动程度决定着基层韧性水平,并外在影响到基层治理共同体的实践进程。基于制度和组织的互构机制,本文甄别出基层韧性的不同形态及其条件,为新时代“枫桥经验”推动基层韧性建设的路径选择提供支撑。

关键词: 纠纷治理, 事本, 人本, 基层韧性

Abstract:

The implementation of the“Fengqiao Experience” in the new era depends on the interaction between institutions and organizations. Judged by the types of empirical conflicts solution alternatives, the method used to resolve these conflicts influences grassroots resilience. The paper argues that materialist mediation differs from humanist mediation. The former is framed by institutions and aims to achieve social order and to establish an institutional mechanism for the parties in conflict. The latter is framed by organizations and aims to reconstruct social connection network and to form a consensus mechanism. From the perspective of resilience theory, this paper constructs an analysis framework to distinguish three different degrees of grassroots resilience and concludes the corresponding preconditions. The conclusion contributes a pathway for the “Fengqiao Experience ”in the new era.

Key words: conflicts governance, materialism, humanism, grassroots resilience

中图分类号: