治理研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 141-156.

• 法与治理 • 上一篇    

论企业数据侵权损害赔偿的区分计算规则

姬蕾蕾   

  • 收稿日期:2025-01-23 出版日期:2026-05-15 发布日期:2026-07-02
  • 作者简介:姬蕾蕾,华东政法大学中国法治战略研究院讲师,互联网法治研究院(杭州)研究员。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“数据交易的规则构建研究”(23YJC820014)

On the Distinctive Calculation Rules for Damages in Enterprise Data Infringement

Ji Leilei   

  • Received:2025-01-23 Published:2026-05-15 Online:2026-07-02

摘要:

数据的无形性和可复制性导致企业数据权益的损害赔偿成为亟待解决的司法难题。数据流通的动态性、数据价值的依附性及数据损害的不确定性,决定侵害企业数据的损害赔偿可运用算法思维区分计算。企业数据财产权益的独立性是数据侵权损害具有可赔偿性的逻辑前提。以数据价值的生成规律为基准,将数据区分为数据集合和智能产品,在此基础上分别计算侵权损害赔偿数额。数据集合的价值由“在先利益+商业附加值”构成,企业享有的排他数据以商业附加值为限,其损害表现为市场交易产生的未来收益损失,故可适用许可使用费标准确定赔偿数额,并以交易机会分析法计算。智能产品的价值由“技术价值与市场价值”构成,其损害表现为市场占有份额的减少,故适用获利返还标准确定赔偿数额。鉴于智能产品的标准化程度较低,可以其成交价值为基础运用收益法评估,并扣除侵权人非侵权获利部分,计算出合理的损害赔偿数额。

关键词: 企业数据权益, 损害赔偿, 区分计算规则, 数据集合, 智能产品

Abstract:

The intangibility and replicability of data make the assessment of damages for infringements upon enterprise data rights a pressing judicial challenge. The dynamic circulation of data, the dependency of data value on specific contexts, and the uncertainty surrounding data-related harm together suggest that damages for infringements on enterprise data should be calculated through an algorithmic approach that differentiates between distinct types of data. The independence of proprietary interests in enterprise data constitutes the logical premise for the compensability of such damages. Based on the mechanisms through which data value is generated, enterprise data can be categorized into two types: data sets and intelligent products. The calculation of damages should differ accordingly. The value of data sets consists of prior interests and commercial added value. An enterprise’s exclusive control over data is limited to the commercial added value component. The harm caused by infringement primarily manifests through the loss of future revenue generated through market transactions. Accordingly, damages may be determined by applying a reasonable royalty standard, calculated through an opportunity analysis method. By contrast, the value of intelligent products is composed of technological value and market value. Infringement typically results in a reduction of market share. In such cases, damages should be determined under a disgorgement of profits standard. Given the relatively low degree of standardization of intelligent products, their value can be assessed based on transaction prices using the income approach, with the portion of profits attributable to non-infringing factors deducted to arrive at a reasonable amount of compensation.

Key words: enterprise data rights, damages, distinctive calculation rules, data set, intelligent product

中图分类号: