治理研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 142-156.

• 法与治理 • 上一篇    

人工智能量刑系统应用的公正性、伦理价值及限度

郑海味, 赖利娜, 章奕宁   

  • 收稿日期:2023-12-27 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 赖利娜,杭州电子科技大学法学院讲师。
  • 作者简介:郑海味,杭州电子科技大学知识产权研究院院长、副教授。
    章奕宁,湖州市中级人民法院法官助理。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省法学会项目“基于区块链的数字版权保护模式研究”(2023NC13)

Artificial Intelligence-assisted Sentencing System

Zheng Haiwei, Lai Lina, Zhang Yining   

  • Received:2023-12-27 Published:2024-05-15 Online:2024-06-12

摘要:

智慧司法建设促使人工智能量刑系统逐步介入审判活动,对实现“同案同判”具有重要意义。然而,人工智能量刑系统在司法领域应用时存在适用性不良的问题,从而降低其应用价值。因此,确定人工智能量刑系统介入审判活动的限度可以提高司法实践价值。为此,可以从理念、制度和技术等多层面的配套措施为其划定应用边界:在理念层面拓展应用外部边界;在制度层面合理限缩应用边界;在技术层面挖潜应用内部边界。但必须明确的是,人工智能量刑系统的应用不是以促进司法公正为主要目标,而是以提升司法效率为主要目标。

关键词: 人工智能量刑系统, 司法公正, 伦理价值, 应用限度

Abstract:

An intelligent judiciary is possible through the gradual integration of artificial intelligence sentencing systems into trial activities, aiming to achieve consistency in sentencing for similar cases. However, beyond the practical level, there are concerns about judicial fairness and ethics; boundaries need to be established. A multifaceted approach is essential, encompassing philosophical, institutional, and technological aspects. At the philosophical level, external expansion of application boundaries should be considered. Institutionally, reasonable limitations on application boundaries are crucial. Technologically, efforts should focus on unlocking the system's potential within the existing boundaries. Furthermore, the application of artificial intelligence sentencing systems should primarily aim to enhance judicial efficiency rather than solely promoting judicial fairness.

Key words: artificial intelligence, sentencing system, judicial fairness, judicial ethics, limits of application

中图分类号: