区域党建一体化驱动跨域协同治理:作用机制与实践框架——基于长三角一体化实践的研究

治理研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 127-141.

区域党建一体化驱动跨域协同治理:作用机制与实践框架——基于长三角一体化实践的研究

阚道远, 杨宁

收稿日期:2023-12-11 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-06-12
通讯作者: 杨宁,复旦大学马克思主义学院博士研究生。
作者简介:阚道远,复旦大学纪检监察研究院副院长,马克思主义学院研究员、博士生导师。
基金资助:
国家社科基金一般项目“大党独有难题对马克思主义建党学说的贡献研究”(23BKS051);上海市党建研究会项目“实施长三角一体化战略对毗邻地区党的基层组织设置和活动方式带来的影响及对策研究”

Regional Party Building Integration Drives Cross-Regional Coordinated Governance: Mechanism and Practical Framework——Research based on the practice of integration in the Yangtze River Delta Region

Kan Daoyuan, Yang Ning

Received:2023-12-11 Published:2024-05-15 Online:2024-06-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

作为区域一体化的推动者和领导者,中国共产党在跨域治理中居于中轴地位,为破除地区及组织之间的壁垒、实现区域合作及资源优化配置提供了坚强政治保障。近年来,长三角地区以跨域党建共同体推动跨域治理共同体,探索出“区域党建一体化”这一涵盖诸多实践样态的新型党建模式。为了回应既有研究理论分析视角和“政党”主体关注的不足,在“区域党建一体化”概念理论化阐释基础上,构建出“政党驱动跨域协同治理”分析模型,为深刻揭示其驱动跨域协同治理的作用机制和实践框架提供了理论分析工具。在这一分析模型中,区域党建一体化以整合多元主体的公共权威体系、组织网络体系和资源共享体系,成为驱动跨域协同治理、进而实现区域一体化发展的“动力引擎”。区域党建一体化的作用机制既提供了目标赋予、关系网络、规则制度等结构支持,也提供了政治领导、思想引领、信息沟通、资源供给等行动支持。然而,区域党建一体化的实际意义,不只是为跨域协同治理提供了一种实践框架,也是为实现以区域现代化推动中国式现代化进程提供了一种制度安排。

关键词: 区域党建一体化, 党建引领, 区域一体化, 跨域治理, 协同治理

Abstract:

As the promoter and leader of regional integration, the CPC plays a central role in cross-regional governance. It provides a strong political guarantee for breaking down barriers between regions and between organizations, achieving regional cooperation and optimization through the allocation of resources. In recent years, the Yangtze River Delta region has promoted cross-regional governance communities through cross-regional Party building communities. This exploration of a new type of Party building model called “regional Party building integration” covers a variety of practical forms. The existing research theoretical analysis perspectives are insufficient. In this article, the focus is on the “Party” and the theoretical interpretation of the concept of “regional Party building integration.” The study’s analytical model of “Party-driven cross-regional collaborative governance” reveals the mechanism and practical framework for driving cross-regional collaborative governance. This analytical model reveals that regional Party building integrates the public authority system, organizational network system, and resource sharing system of multiple entities. Thus, it becomes the “driving force” for cross-regional collaborative governance and achieves regional integrative development. The mechanism of regional Party building integration provides structural support in terms of target allocation, relationship networks, and rule systems. It also provides action support in terms of political leadership, ideological guidance, information communication, and resource supply. This framework of regional Party building integration forms a multi-level network through organizational construction. The purpose is to achieve overall guidance and promotion through coordinated integration and to form an open cycle process through collaborative links. The actual significance of regional Party building integration is not just to provide a practical framework for cross-regional collaborative governance. It is also to provide a system arrangement for achieving regional modernization and driving forward the Chinese path to modernization.

Key words: regional Party building integration, Party building leading, regional integration, cross-regional governance, collaborative governance

中图分类号:

阚道远, 杨宁. 区域党建一体化驱动跨域协同治理:作用机制与实践框架——基于长三角一体化实践的研究[J]. 治理研究, 2024, 40(3): 127-141.

Kan Daoyuan, Yang Ning. Regional Party Building Integration Drives Cross-Regional Coordinated Governance: Mechanism and Practical Framework——Research based on the practice of integration in the Yangtze River Delta Region[J]. Governance Studies, 2024, 40(3): 127-141.

[1]	朱亚鹏, 易敏, 崔雨鑫. 党建引领如何破解中国基层治理的三重困境?——基于广州市南沙区的实践[J]. 治理研究, 2024, 40(3): 61-78.
[2]	张友浪, 冉宇豪. 多元协同治理如何助力公共服务合作生产?——基于R县“村超”赛事的制度分析[J]. 治理研究, 2024, 40(2): 57-72.
[3]	徐梦周, 朱永竹, 杨大鹏. 数字经济发展的空间关联与协同治理:以长三角城市群为例[J]. 治理研究, 2022, 38(5): 102-112.
[4]	张会平, 顾勤. 政府数据流动:方式、实践困境与协同治理[J]. 治理研究, 2022, 38(3): 59-69.
[5]	岳经纶, 刘洋. 党建引领社区善治的逻辑——基于浙江省N街道的研究[J]. 治理研究, 2021, 37(5): 59-69.
[6]	董明. 新时代赋能基层治理的地方政协探索——基于浙江“请你来协商”实践的分析[J]. 治理研究, 2021, 37(4): 71-81.
[7]	胡重明. “政府即平台”是可能的吗？——一个协同治理数字化实践的案例研究[J]. 治理研究, 2020, 36(3): 16-25.
[8]	阿尔伯特·梅耶尔；曼努埃尔·佩德罗. 治理智慧城市：智慧城市治理的文献回顾[J]. 治理研究, 2020, 36(2): 90-99.
[9]	孙少石. 电信网络诈骗协同治理的制度逻辑[J]. 治理研究, 2020, 36(1): 100-113.
[10]	柳宝军崔健东. 新时代增强全面从严治党系统性的理论思考[J]. 治理研究, 2019, 35(6): 32-41.
[11]	陈怡俊黄海峰. 社会影响力债券：社会公共服务供给机制的创新[J]. 治理研究, 2019, 35(6): 98-107.
[12]	陈建军陈怀锦刘实徐倩. 区域一体化背景下的长三角大湾区研究：基于国内外比较的视角[J]. 治理研究, 2019, 35(1): 37-44.
[13]	葛亮. 群团组织与社会协同——基于四个案例的比较分析[J]. 治理研究, 2018, 34(6): 85-92.
[14]	翟绍果. 健康贫困的协同治理：逻辑、经验与路径[J]. 治理研究, 2018, 34(5): 53-60.
[15]	田园宏丁进锋. 大部制背景下长三角地区污水治理策略选择[J]. 治理研究, 2018, 34(5): 71-79.