治理研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 4-21.

• 本刊特稿 •    下一篇

“三治融合”与重构基层社会

张文显, 徐勇, 邱泽奇, 何显明   

  • 收稿日期:2023-10-02 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2023-12-12
  • 作者简介:张文显,中国法学会党组成员、中国法学会学术委员会主任;
    徐 勇,华中师范大学文科资深教授、政治学部部长;
    邱泽奇, 北京大学社会学系教授;
    何显明, 浙江工商大学公共管理学院教授。

“Three Governance Fusion”and Reconstruction of Grassroots Society

Zhang Wenxian, Xu Yong, Qiu Zeqi, He Xianming   

  • Received:2023-10-02 Published:2023-11-15 Online:2023-12-12

摘要:

主持人语:

党的十八大以来,以习近平同志为核心的党中央高度重视基层治理。2013年,自治、法治、德治“三治融合”建设肇始于浙江省桐乡市。十年来,它从一个地方创新上升为中央政策,进而被扩散到全国,这充分体现了“三治融合”在破解基层治理难题上所具有的成效。那么,这是否意味着“三治融合”能够从根本上突破已有基层治理的局限,从而型构一种全新的治理模式?更进一步地,“三治融合”对于现代基层社会的重构是否具有关键意义?

本期编发的笔谈有针对性地回应了上述问题,我们期待引发学界对“三治融合”与重构基层社会的关注和争鸣。张文显教授认为,“三治融合”是“新时代‘枫桥经验’”命题的实践依据和理论来源,它从“盆景”变成为“风景”具有深刻的理论逻辑和政治逻辑。当前,自治、法治、德治相结合(“三治融合”)是一个不宜更改的科学概念。徐勇教授认为,面向未来,进一步创新发展“三治融合”,必须走体系化的道路,包括加快构建完善组织体系、工作体系、服务体系、制度体系、支持体系和理论体系,推进基层治理体系和治理能力现代化。邱泽奇教授认为,在现代中国,基层社会的异质性不断增强,基层社会与世界的关联性增强,基层社会结构出现了尾部断链的格局,出现了零散化的个人与整体化的社会秩序之间的冲突。创新基层治理,首要的是重构基层社会,而桐乡的“三治融合”实践对此作出了积极探索。何显明教授认为,桐乡“三治融合”贯穿着三大议程:一是多元治理主体的协同共治;二是多元治理资源的优化整合;三是多元治理工具的融合赋能。

本专题主持人:郁建兴(教育部长江学者特聘教授,浙江工商大学党委书记,浙江大学社会治理研究院院长)

Abstract:

In 2013, the construction of “Three Governance Fusion” began in Tongxiang City, Zhejiang Province. Over the past ten years, it has arisen from a local innovation to a central policy, and has now been spread to the whole country, which fully reflects the effectiveness of “Three Governance Fusion” in solving the problems of grassroots governance. So, does this mean that the “Three Governance Fusion” can fundamentally break through the limitations of the existing grass-roots governance, so as to form a new governance model? Further,does “Three Governance Fusion” have key significance for the reconstruction of modern grassroots society?

The written discussion is a targeted response to the above questions. We hope to arouse the academic community’s attention and debate on the “Three Governance Fusion” and the reconstruction of grassroots society. Professor Zhang Wenxian believes that “Three Governance Fusion” is the theoretical basis and practical source of the proposition of “Fengqiao Experience in the new era”, and it has profound theoretical and political logic from “bonsai” to “landscape”. At present, the “Three Governance Fusion” of autonomy, rule of law, and rule of virtue is a scientific concept that should not be changed. Professor Xu Yong believes that facing the future, to further innovate and develop the “Three Governance Fusion”, we must take the road of systematization, including construction and improvement of the organizational system, the work system, the service system, the institutional system, the support system, and the theoretical system, and the promotion of modernization of the grass-roots governance system and governance capacity. Professor Qiu Zeqi believes that in modern China, the heterogeneity of the grass-roots society is increasing, the correlation between the grass-roots society and the world is increasing, and the grass-roots social structure is breaking off the tail chain, and there is a conflict between the fragmented individual and the integrated social order. To innovate grassroots governance, the first thing is to reconstruct grassroots society, and Tongxiang’s “Three Governance Fusion” practice has made an active exploration of this. Professor He Xianming believes that Tongxiang’s “Three Governance Fusion” runs through three major agendas: first, the coordination and co-governance of multiple governance subjects; second, the optimization and integration of multiple governance resources; and, third, the integration and empowerment of multiple governance tools.

Key words: Three governance Fusion, reconstruction of grassroots society, modernization of grass-roots society governance

中图分类号: