治理研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 108-124.

• “八八战略”二十年:浙江现象与经验 • 上一篇    下一篇

公共服务合作供给中的公共性与效率平衡机制——以N市Y区公益转贷中心为研究对象

滕红燕, 朱心怡   

  • 收稿日期:2022-11-27 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-08-02
  • 通讯作者: 朱心怡,管理学博士,浙江工商大学公共管理学院讲师。
  • 作者简介:滕红燕,浙江大学公共管理学院博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“全面建设社会主义现代化国家新征程中加快实现共同富裕研究”(21JZD019)

How to Balance Publicness and Efficiency in Collaborative Service Delivery: A Case Study of the Nonprofit Re-Lending Platform in Y District, N City

Teng Hongyan, Zhu Xinyi   

  • Received:2022-11-27 Published:2023-07-15 Online:2023-08-02

摘要:

政府在公共服务的合作供给中应如何平衡公共性与效率?已有研究探讨了合作供给中可能影响公共性或效率的因素和应对策略,但尚未充分考量公共性与效率的平衡机制及实现路径。在合作供给中平衡公共性与效率,应将公共性置于主导地位,对效率的提升以不影响公共性为前提;同时,政府行政权力对公共性的治理应控制在一定限度内,以保证公共服务的供给效率。N市Y区公益转贷中心的案例表明,政府可通过构建合作共识、建立问责机制和风险防范机制等方式,在合作机制的顶层设计层面实现对公共性的治理和保持,从而减少行政权力在执行和操作层面上的过度介入,以避免影响合作供给的效率;同时,将合作方的营利行为限定在合作的执行和操作层面上,既可运用市场化的激励机制来提高合作供给的效率,亦可防止合作方过度的营利动机损害公共性。

关键词: 政府和社会组织关系, 公共性, 效率, 合作供给, 跨部门合作机制

Abstract:

How does the government balance the publicness and efficiency of public service in collaborative service delivery? Existing research mainly focuses on the factors and tactics that may influence publicness or efficiency, but rarely discusses the mechanisms used to balance these dual goals. Given the relationship between publicness and efficiency in the development history of public administration, this paper proposes that to balance publicness and efficiency, publicness should be placed in a dominant position. Put simply, the improvement of efficiency should not affect publicness. Government intervention to achieve publicness should be constrained within a certain limit to ensure the efficiency of service delivery. Using a case analysis of the nonprofit re-lending platform in Y District, N City, this paper presents a theoretical framework to explain the mechanisms of how the government balances publicness and efficiency in collaborative service delivery. The government can achieve and maintain publicness by focusing on the top-level design of collaborative governance mechanisms, namely, through building consensus on collaboration, establishing accountability mechanisms and risk prevention mechanisms, thereby reducing its excessive intervention at the executive and operational levels, which helps to avoid the loss of efficiency. But, the government should limit the partners’ profit-making behavior to the level of execution and operation. This can improve efficiency through the use of market-oriented incentive mechanisms but also prevent partners’ excessive profit-making motivations from harming the publicness of public service.

Key words: government-nonprofit relationships, publicness, efficiency, collaborative service delivery, cross-sector collaborative mechanisms

中图分类号: