治理研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 139-156.

• 法与治理 • 上一篇    

元宇宙中数字财产权的制度建构——以若干NFT科学实验为基础

杨延超   

  • 收稿日期:2023-01-13 出版日期:2023-03-15 发布日期:2023-04-04
  • 作者简介:杨延超,中国社会科学院法学研究所研究员,科技与法研究中心主任,中国社会科学院大学教授、博士生导师。

The Institutional Construction of Digital Property Rights in the Metaverse——Based on Several NFT Scientific Experiments

Yang Yanchao   

  • Received:2023-01-13 Published:2023-03-15 Online:2023-04-04

摘要:

元宇宙正在催生人类社会呈现现实社会与虚拟社会并存的二元社会格局。元宇宙也催生了虚拟社会中大量虚拟物的产生,虚拟物可以被实际使用,其呈现出虚拟性、智能性和去中心化的特征。区别于现实社会中的财产权制度,NFT催生了虚拟物的稀缺性和可交易性,也催生了虚拟物新型财产权形态。虚拟物的所有权区别于既有的财产权概念。与既有的虚拟财产相比较,虚拟物则是基于区块链去中心化的技术架构,实现了用户对于虚拟物的直接、绝对支配。与知识产权中的作品相比较,虚拟物所有权概念追求对元宇宙中特定虚拟物的保护。为此,有必要独立设计虚拟物所有权内容,包括铸币权、密钥控制权、使用权、移转权、永久收益权、销毁权等权利内容。虚拟物所有权实现了所有权制度从现实世界向虚拟世界的延伸和跨越,同时,它也实现了传统所有权制度的创新与突破。用户基于区块链的密钥机制实现对虚拟物的确权和交易;同时基于去中心化的信用建构,元宇宙中虚拟物侵权救济制度同样也呈现特殊性:区别于现实社会中的占有推定效力,虚拟物则奉行占有确定效力,并据此形成权利救济制度建构。与此同时,在制度建构中还需要处理好元宇宙中虚拟物所有权与其知识产权的关系:既要明确虚拟物所有权与知识产权相互独立原则;又要探究二者的互动关系。当下,对于元宇宙虚拟物财产权的制度建构还处于初级阶段,随着元宇宙产业的发展与进步,相关研究也将进一步深入。

关键词: 元宇宙, 数据财产权, 虚拟物, 所有权, 智能合约

Abstract:

The metaverse allows a dual social pattern where real society and virtual society coexist. The metaverse also generatesmany virtual objects in the virtual society. These objects can be used, thereby showing their characteristics of virtuality, intelligence, and decentralization. Different from the property right system in the real society, the system that creates the Non Fungile Token (NFT) relies on scarce but still tradable virtual goods which include property rights. The ownership of virtual things is different from the existing concept of property rights. Compared with the existing virtual property, virtual objects are based on the decentralized technical architecture of a blockchain, which realizes the direct and absolute dominance of users over virtual objects. Compared with works covered by traditional intellectual property rights, the concept of virtual object ownership protects specific virtual objects in the metaverse. Therefore, it is necessary to independently design the ownership rights of virtual property, including coin casting right, key control right, use right, transfer right, permanent income right, destruction right, and other rights. The ownership of virtual objects extends the ownership system in the real world into the virtual world but also departs from it. At the same time, the metaverse’s innovations have been a breakthrough in the traditional ownership system. The key mechanism of the blockchain allows users to authenticate, and trade in, virtual objects. At the same time, the decentralized credit construction of the system provides relief from the infringement of virtual objects in the metaverse. Different from the presumption of possession in the real world, virtual object rights are determinedthrough possession as determined by the virtual object and the form of relief for violations is built accordingly. At the same time, in the process of institutional construction, we also need to deal with the relationship between the ownership of virtual things and their intellectual property rights in the metaverse. We should also explore the interaction between them. At present, the institutional construction of the property rights of virtual things in the metaverse is still in its infancy. With the development of the metaverse industry, the research will be further deepened.

Key words: metaverse, data property rights, virtual objects, ownership, smart contract

中图分类号: