治理研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 25-39.

• 数字政府与数字治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字平台参与政府治理的正当性及其实现路径

马怀德, 王晓淑   

  • 收稿日期:2024-04-07 出版日期:2024-11-15 发布日期:2024-12-25
  • 通讯作者: 王晓淑
  • 作者简介:王晓淑,北京林业大学人文社会科学学院讲师。
    马怀德,中国政法大学教授;
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大专项项目“习近平法治思想与中国特色法学学科体系、学术体系、话语体系创新研究”(2022JZDZ003)

The Legitimacy and Implementation Pathways of Digital Platform Participation in Government Governance

Ma Huaide, Wang Xiaoshu   

  • Received:2024-04-07 Published:2024-11-15 Online:2024-12-25
  • Contact: Wang Xiaoshu

摘要:

数字平台作为政府、企业与公众之间的桥梁,在数字政府治理体系中不仅为公众提供便捷服务,而且逐渐显现其公共属性。数字平台积极参与政府治理与公共决策,推动治理效能和公共服务的革新。同时,数字平台在发挥公共治理的功能时也面临着法律规范层面的职权法定原则受动摇、正当程序原则被挑战以及算法歧视待破解等问题,亟需明晰数字平台的权力边界,重塑行政组织结构、明确数字平台作为治理主体的法律定位,强化正当程序原则的适用并审慎选择设计合理、技术可控、符合伦理和法律要求的算法系统,为数字平台参与政府治理提供具体的实践路径,保障数字政府治理的公正与高效。

关键词: 数字平台, 数字政府, 平台权力, 数字法治

Abstract:

As a bridge between the government, business, and the public, digital platforms not only provide convenient public services within the digital government governance system but also increasingly demonstrate their public attributes. By aiding the process of public decision-making, they drive innovations in governance efficiency and public services. However, digital platforms also perform their public governance functions while creating challenges to legal rights. They undermine statutory authority; they weaken due process, and their algorithms discriminate. To correct this, the boundaries of digital platform authority need clarification. This means reshaping administrative organizational structures. The legal position of digital platforms as governance entities must be defined and due process strengthened. Additionally, algorithms must be reasonable, technically controllable, and compliant with ethical and legal requirements. These measures will provide practical pathways for digital platforms to participate in government governance that is both fair and efficient.

Key words: digital platforms, digital government, platform power, digital rule of law

中图分类号: