治理研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 127-144.

• 法与治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

数智时代税收征管改革的正义观

刘剑文, 张王南   

  • 收稿日期:2025-08-23 出版日期:2026-01-15 发布日期:2026-04-17
  • 作者简介:刘剑文,辽宁大学法学院特聘教授、北京大学法学院教授、博士生导师;
    张王南,辽宁大学法学院博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    中国法学会贯彻落实党的二十届三中全会精神专项课题“财税法治现代化的中国路径专题研究”(CLS(2025)ZX0025)

The Conception of Justice for Tax Administration Reform in the Era of Digital Intelligence

Liu Jianwen, Zhang Wangnan   

  • Received:2025-08-23 Published:2026-01-15 Online:2026-04-17

摘要:

我国税收征管正大步迈入“数智时代”。传统税法治理框架难以应对数智化进程带来的权力异变、数字鸿沟与数智成本负担等新兴问题。对此,应当以“数智正义”为价值引领,为征管治理的框架革新指引方向。数智正义,包含控权、公平与效率三个基本面向。在控权面向,应明晰税务机关履行法定职责所必需的范围和限度,以厘定涉税信息处理权的扩张边界,并从合法与合理二元维度控制自动化设备的应用。在公平面向,应以纳税人协助请求权弥合征管数智化所产生的数字鸿沟。在效率面向,针对数智成本负担的无序现状,应遵循“受益原则—总征纳成本—纳税人可容忍性”的判断逻辑,寻求具体场景中的最适方案。

关键词: 数智正义, 涉税信息处理权, 自动化行政, 数字鸿沟, 数智成本

Abstract:

Tax administration in China is rapidly advancing into the era of “digital intelligence.” However, tax law’s traditional governance framework is ill-equipped to address the challenges arising from this process, such as the alienation of power, the digital divide, and the costs of digital intelligence. In response, “digital intelligence justice” should be adopted as the guiding value to chart the course for the structural reform of tax administration governance. Digital intelligence justice encompasses three fundamental dimensions: control of power, equity, and efficiency. The control of powerrequires a clearset of limits for tax authorities to discharge their statutory duties, thereby delineating the boundaries for the expansion of the power to process tax-related information. Furthermore, the application of automated systems must be regulated from the dual dimensions of legality and rationality. Equity is the taxpayer’s right to request assistance, and it should be leveraged to bridge the digital divide engendered by the digital intelligence transformation of tax administration. Efficiency means ordering thecurrently disordered state of digital intelligence cost burdens.An optimal solution for specific scenarios should be sought by adhering to the evaluative logic of“the benefit principle—total tax compliance and administration costs—taxpayer tolerability.”

Key words: digital intelligence justice, power to process tax-related information, automated administration, digital divide, digital intelligence costs

中图分类号: