治理研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 75-91.

• 数字政府与数字治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

价值共损:理解技术治理的新视角——基于S市智慧社区的多案例研究

王欢明, 甄可晴   

  • 收稿日期:2023-06-01 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-03-04
  • 作者简介:王欢明,管理学博士,大连理工大学公共管理学院院长、教授、博士生导师;
    甄可晴,大连理工大学公共管理学院硕士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“构建高质量社会领域公共服务体系研究”(21JZD034);国家社科基金后期资助项目“中国情景下的公共服务合作生产与价值共创”(23FGLB015);中央高校基本科研业务经费项目“高质量社会领域公共服务体系研究”(DUT22RW309)

Value Codestruction: Understanding the New Perspective of 'Technology Governance A Case Study of Smart Community Governance in S City

Wand Huanming, Zhen Keqing   

  • Received:2023-06-01 Published:2024-01-15 Online:2024-03-04

摘要:

科技作为社会治理体系建设的支撑力量,技术治理已成为众多城市新的治理方式,但在目前治理实践中却存在着一些价值共损问题。通过对S市20个街道的智慧社区项目进行实地调研,并对访谈资料进行扎根分析,探究出技术治理中价值共损问题的解释框架。具体而言,技术治理的价值产生与否受“战略三角形”中使命、支持与合法性、运作能力三个因素影响,也受到供需匹配度、主体互动矛盾这两个方面的共同影响,该五条路径缺一不可。研究结果表明智慧治理实践中要精准识别供需方特点,确定各主体清晰的行动目标,给予充分的组织支持,提高主体运作能力,处理好各主体合作中的矛盾冲突。

关键词: 技术治理, 数字治理, 智慧社区, 价值共损, 战略三角形

Abstract:

Technology governance has become a new governance mode in more and more cities, but value codestruction problems also appear in the current governance. This paper takes the smart community construction in Scity as an example. Through the grounded theory analysis of 20 subdistrict interviews, we found that technologygovernance was influenced by three factors of the triangle strategic model: value objectives, legitimacy andsupport, and operational capacity, as well as matching supply and demand and resolving conflicts among actors. These five factors were then used to construct the value co-destruction framework. Therefore, in smart govemance, we should accurately identify the characteristics of supply and demand parties,set consistent and clear actiongoals,provide full organizational support, maintain a high level of operation capacity, and deal with the conflicts inthe cooperation.

Key words: technology governance, digital governance, value codestruction, smart community, the trianglestrategic model

中图分类号: