治理研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 45-58.

• 国家治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

规划中国、制度中国与真实中国:发展与治理的政治逻辑

张树平   

  • 收稿日期:2021-08-23 出版日期:2022-05-15 发布日期:2022-05-25
  • 作者简介:张树平,上海社会科学院政治与公共管理研究所副研究员,上海社会科学院政治与公共管理研究所“远复历史政治学研究中心”主任。
  • 基金资助:
    马克思主义理论研究和建设工程重大项目“‘四个全面’战略布局研究”(2015MZD004);上海市哲学社会科学规划一般项目“中国古代国家治理中的‘情治’传统及其现代启示:一项历史政治学研究”(2020BZZ004);上海社会科学院创新工程项目“中国古代国家治理传统的现代转化研究”(31801423)

Planning China, Institutional China, and Real China: The Political Logic of Development and Governance

Zhang Shuping   

  • Received:2021-08-23 Published:2022-05-15 Online:2022-05-25

摘要:

中国政治的古今之变提出了现代中国国家建设中发展与治理两大主题;由发展主题衍生出国家的规划体系建设,由治理主题衍生出国家的制度体系建设,构成现代国家建设的两大战略任务。围绕着国家发展与国家治理,中国现代国家建设相续形成了“向解放寻求现代”“向发展寻求解放”“向治理寻求发展”的政治逻辑,并由此生成不同的政治形态。这些不同的政治形态深刻规定着国家规划与国家制度建设两大战略的实施形态及其相互关系:从“全能型计划”到“中心规划”再到“全面规划”,从“立国制度”建设到“关联制度”建设再到“全面制度”建设,“规划中国”与“制度中国”的交汇与合流内在地衍生出“真实中国”建构问题。在通往未来之路上,“向治理寻求发展”政治逻辑所孕育的“向(人民)民主寻求治理”的政治逻辑,将引领“规划中国”“制度中国”和“真实中国”建构及其互动格局,并由此真正实现中国现代国家治理在发展基础上对传统国家治理形态和治理困境的完全超越。

关键词: 发展, 治理, 规划中国, 制度中国, 真实中国

Abstract:

The changes in China's politics from ancient to modern have put forward two crucial issues in modern Chinese state building, namely, development and governance. From the development perspective, there was derived the great strategic task of construction of the state planning system. From the governance persepctive, there was derived another great strategic task of construction of the state institutional system. Centering on state development and state governance, the political logics of “seeking modernity through emancipation”“seeking emancipation through development”and “seeking development through governance” have been successively formed in modern Chinese state building, thus different political forms have been generated. These different political forms profoundly determined the implementation of the state planning system and the state institutional system and their relations with each other. From “omnipotent planning” to “central planning” and then to “comprehensive planning”, from the construction of “state founding institutions” to “interrelated institutions” and then to “comprehensive institutions”, the intersection and confluence of “planning China” and “institutional China” inherently gave rise to the problem of constructing the “real China”. On the road to the future, the political logic of “seeking governance through democracy” bred by the political logic of “seeking development through governance”, will lead the interaction patterns among “planning China” “institutional China” and “real China”. Thus, this will mark the complete transcendence of modern Chinese state governance based on development over the traditional form of state governance.

Key words: development, governance, planning China, institutional China, real China

中图分类号: