Abstract:

The listed supervision system is now being used to deal with increasingly complex safety governance issues. Developed for social security governance and then used for ecological environmental protection, production safety and other fields, the system creatively integrates the supervision mechanism with Chinese characteristics into the complex governance scene. It has achieved remarkable governance results across regulatory fields. As a key facet of Chinese public management, it has been frequently used and studied in recent years. The political pressure, social pressure, and time pressure contained in listing supervision combine to form strong political potential energy. This prompts supervision objects such as local governments and their functional departments to immediately strengthen their political execution, organizational coordination, and social response. It is the signal that central policy objectives must be completed in a relatively short period of time. In this case, it was used to improve the efficiency of safety governance. Despite this record of success, we should adhere to a rational and scientific attitude when objectively evaluating the governance performance of the listed supervision office. On this basis, scholars can clarify the listed supervision system’s effectiveness boundaries, identify the underlying logic of its operation with higher quality research work, and develop countermeasures therefrom to ensure it always plays a positive function.

Key words: listing supervision, the “pressure triangle”, operation mechanism, Chinese-style inspection system, underlying logic