Loading...
Welcome to Governance Studies ! Today is Share:
$ex.waitFor()

Table of Content

    15 July 2025, Volume 41 Issue 4
    Clarifying the Basics: Reconstruction of Governance Units under the Guidance of Social Governance Community
    Xu Yong, Zou Zhaobin
    2025, 41(4):  4-16. 
    Asbtract ( 54 )   HTML ( 3)   PDF (1129KB) ( 33 )  
    References | Related Articles | Metrics

    The division and reconstruction of basic governance units are fundamental propositions for building a social governance community. From a political science perspective, the basics of governance units are not static concepts, but dynamic categories that evolve with governance goals and organizational system functions. The determination of basic governance units is a dynamic process, but its inherent elements are stable and unchanging. It is precisely in the dimensions of nature, function, and scale that the basic governance unit becomes the basics of the national governance and social governance systems. The construction process of basic governance units is a process of mutual construction of different elements, in which the trinity element model is composed of common interests, common actions, and common spirit. The reconstruction of governance units must also account for both historical experience and the nation’s immediate needs. By transforming external guidance into internal organization, external requirements into internal incentives, common interests into shared responsibilities, the basic governance unit becomes stronger. It is then more likely to build a stable operational mechanisms that can achieve long-term sustainability for the unit. This continuity will ultimately lead to a social governance community in which all are responsible all are accountable, and all are entitled to share.

    The Discursive Connotations and Practical Logic of Leading by Party Building in the Construction of the Social Governance Community
    Chen Junya, Yan Ruiguang
    2025, 41(4):  17-27. 
    Asbtract ( 47 )   HTML ( 3)   PDF (1044KB) ( 16 )  
    References | Related Articles | Metrics

    The construction of a social governance community is first and foremost a theoretical issue, before it becomes a practical one. Theoretically, it raises two questions: why and how the governance of modern society should return to the discursive framework of community? Practically, it demands clarification of the logic through which Party building can effectively guide the formation of such a community. Existing theories often refer to community as a concept belonging to pre-modern social structures. Identity construction, shared values, and cooperative participation endow modern community with governance connotations. Rather than a single entity, the Social Governance Community is a shared framework of collective action, comprised of action units, guiding principles, operational capacities, and governance mechanisms. The political leadership, organizational strength, service capacity, and resource allocation capability of primary-level Party organizations provide the driving force for the collective action of the Social Governance Community, thereby strengthening its practical efficacy.

    Optimization of an Organizational Linkage Model: Integration of the Governance and Construction of Rural Governance Community in the Daxiajiang Rural Revitalization Alliance
    Ying Xiaoli
    2025, 41(4):  28-44. 
    Asbtract ( 50 )   HTML ( 4)   PDF (1662KB) ( 14 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    Cross-domain governance in a governance community promotes regional common prosperity and the modernization of rural governance. The experience of the Daxiajiang Rural Revitalization Consortium from the perspective of organizational research shows that the decisive premise of effective governance is not the closeness-loose or tight-of the governance structure, but rather the dynamic optimization and functional adaptation of the governance structure to the organizational association. The governance structure must effectively connect the governance units, integrate the governance resources, and stimulate collaborative action, so as to shape the governance community into a combination of governance and domain. This study reveals the internal logic of optimizing organizational associations as a stable mechanism for building a governance community. It also provides a practical path for realizing a community where “all are responsible, all are accountable, and all are entitled to share” in rural governance.

    Data Governance Promoting Innovation in Urban Governance: Theoretical basis, Practical Pathways and Mechanisms
    Meng Tianguang, Zhang Yuxi
    2025, 41(4):  45-57. 
    Asbtract ( 47 )   HTML ( 4)   PDF (1284KB) ( 15 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    Data is a key resource for urban governance in the digital era. Data governance focused on unleashing the value of data elements is the foundation for the modernization of urban governance. The current literature lacks an analysis of the theoretical connotation of data governance and its support for modernization of urban governance from the holistic perspective of urban governance. This paper explores data governance from three aspects: date-based, data-oriented, and data-processed. Through theoretical analysis and a practical summary, this paper identifies four types of data elements in urban governance: urban spatiotemporal data, operational data, service data, and management data. It also elucidates the theoretical basis of how data governance can promote urban governance, as well as the practical pathways to promote its capabilities in perception, understanding, decision-making precision, and coordination. Data governance provides new impetus and mechanisms for urban governance by promoting positive change in urban governance concepts, enhanced governance capacity, improvement of governance resources, and innovation in governance mechanisms.

    Building Associated Communities:The Practical Path for Future Residential Communities
    Wu Xiaolin, Li Jiangping
    2025, 41(4):  58-73. 
    Asbtract ( 34 )   HTML ( 3)   PDF (1435KB) ( 2 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    Future Community is the imagining of a better community that drives innovation in community development and governance. Over the past 40 years, “low-carbon communities, smart communities, resilient communities, and entire communities” have successively become the realistic forms of “future communities”(FCs). The practice of FC development has four paths: technology-oriented, neighborhood-oriented, function-oriented, and comprehensive oriented. Although the technology-oriented path attaches great importance to the empowerment of digital technology, it easily descends into technological determinism. The neighborhood-oriented path seeks to achieve neighborhood rejuvenation, but ignores the economic foundation it is rooted in. The function-oriented path helps strengthen the specific functions of the community, but it adds little to other elements such as diverse participation and community. The comprehensive oriented path still requires long-term consideration. The ideal FC is a community where “everyone is free and comfortable, life is convenient and healthy, neighbors love to watch, and public affairs are enjoyed independently.” FCs will be realized in three steps. First, in the near term, current problems must be met with solutions and a complete community must be created. In the medium term, a multi-participatory community must form. Finally, in the long term, the community must become connected with “people and property rights, people and people, and people and public affairs” such that these connections become an organic part of a “community of free individuals.”

    Towards a New Governance Morphology: The Temporal-spatial Dimension, Technological Embeddedness and Multi-dimensional Governance
    Ye Lin, Mei Chang
    2025, 41(4):  74-86. 
    Asbtract ( 24 )   HTML ( 1)   PDF (1116KB) ( 3 )  
    References | Related Articles | Metrics

    As an emerging paradigm in the evolution of social governance, the Chinese governance model reflects both the universal contradictions arising from technological rationalization in modernity and the distinctive Chinese characteristics shaped by institutional superiority and practical innovations. Herbert Marcuse's one-dimensional society theory reveals the mechanisms through which technological domination suppresses social complexity through temporal-spatial compression. His dimensional thinking provides theoretical inspiration for constructing three-dimensional governance. Temporality manifests in dynamic processes including social morphology evolution, governance target alignment, and cyclical operational mechanisms, whereas spatiality embodies structural features such as material configurations, conceptual expressions, and organizational hierarchies. Through the dual effects of temporal-spatial compression (homogenizing governance elements to enhance efficiency) and temporal-spatial expansion (activating pluralistic social vitality), technology reconstructs social order while simultaneously imposing risks of administrative alienation and social fragmentation. Globally, traditional governance models predominantly employ temporal-spatial compression to mitigate large-scale governance burdens, often at the cost of diminishing value rationality and breeding mechanical governance patterns. Confronting escalating governance complexity and technological revolution, China's approach emphasizes multidimensional temporal-spatial dialectics under socialist institutional advantages. By strategically integrating institutional optimization, value guidance, and technological virtuousness, China is pioneering a Multi-dimensional Governance framework characterized by “compression-expansion coordination, dimensional permeability, expansion prioritization, and dynamic equilibrium maintenance,” effectively reconciling efficiency-demanding order maintenance and diversity-driven vitality stimulation. This governance innovation presents a pathway for mitigating the dimensional compression challenges observed in modernization, while simultaneously providing conceptual resources rooted in Chinese institutional praxis to navigate beyond the constraints of One-dimensional Governance paradigms prevalent in our intelligence-driven epoch.

    The Era Logic and Value Implications of the Concept of “lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets”
    Shen Manhong
    2025, 41(4):  88-101. 
    Asbtract ( 22 )   HTML ( 1)   PDF (1212KB) ( 8 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    The concept that ”lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets” is the core idea of Xi Jinping's ecological civilization thought. The birth of this concept is rooted in a specific historical background and is characterized by three major contradictions: the contradiction between rapid economic growth and the limited supply of resources as well as low resource utilization efficiency; the contradiction between the expansion of economic aggregate and the intensification of environmental pollution along with the limited environmental capacity; and the contradiction between residents' growing demand for a beautiful environment and the shrinking supply of such an environment. The concept of “lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets” reflects an upward trend in people's needs, a people-centered development philosophy, and the evolution of the primary social contradictions. This concept has significant epistemological, methodological, and practical value in the new era. It guides the theoretical and practical achievements of China's ecological civilization construction through historic, transformative, and comprehensive changes. As it continues to guide the building of China, it will also set an example for other countries in the world.

    The Logic of Realizing the Value of Ecological Products in Ecologically Fragile Areas under the Goal of Common Prosperity—An Empirical Analysis of G City
    Li Hongwei, Zhang Erjin, Zhang Sheng
    2025, 41(4):  102-113. 
    Asbtract ( 21 )   HTML ( 1)   PDF (1667KB) ( 4 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    Promoting coordinated regional development and narrowing regional disparities is an inherent part of common prosperity. Ecologically fragile areas, due to their dual risks of ecological degradation and economic return to poverty, must urgently explore green development methods for realizing the value of ecological products. This should be a symbiotic goal of protection and development that promotes common prosperity. Through empirical analyses of cases, it is found that the realization of ecological product value in ecologically fragile areas that promotes common prosperity follows the practical logic of structural shaping-collaborative cooperation. Structural shaping is the fundamental stability that encompasses the health of the ecosystem, the green development of the economy, and the stability and harmony of society. Collaborative cooperation is an institutional optimization that encompasses the authoritarian potential of the government, the innovative vitality of the market, and the collective actions of the public. The realization of ecological product value in ecologically fragile areas under the practical logic of structure shaping—collaborative cooperation will enhance the stability of the economy + society + nature complex ecosystem. It will also increase the supply of ecological products and enhance the overall social wealth. This will lead to a more effective collaboration e among the government, the market, and society that can ensure a fair distribution of ecological products. Such coordination will also likely act as an effective guarantee for wealth sharing. This practice explains the logic of common prosperity where the increase of ecological wealth and fair distribution go hand in hand.

    Constructing Chinese Modernization Discourse: Starting point, Principles and Paths
    Ren Zhijiang, Lu Daquan
    2025, 41(4):  114-128. 
    Asbtract ( 33 )   HTML ( 1)   PDF (1063KB) ( 7 )  
    References | Related Articles | Metrics

    The construction of Chinese Modernization Discourse is a unity of logic, theory, and reality. It began as the Communist Party of China’s dialectical criticism of Western capitalism’s modernization discourse, the systematic study of modernization in domestic academic circles, and the practice of socialist modernization with Chinese characteristics. All of these threads converged at the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the CPC in 1978. In the process of constructing this discourse, it is necessary to adhere to the political principle of the unity of leadership of the Communist Party of China and people-centeredness and to uphold the principles of world diversity and national subjectivity. We must abide by the academic principle of unifying advanced theoretical guidance and standardized academic research, while adhering to the principle of unifying the basic principles of Marxism with the concrete reality of China and its excellent traditions. This is also in line with the principle of academicism, the principle of combining the basic principles of Marxism with China's concrete realities, and with China's excellent traditional culture, and the principle of expression, which unites political discourse, academic discourse, and popular discourse. Chinese Modernization Discourse can be expeditiously realized from preliminary construction to a mature and finalized form through the process of applying the worldview and methodology of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, promoting practice-based theoretical innovation, innovating the means of expression and dissemination of the discourse, adhering to the innovation centered on the real issues and the essence of socialist modernization, and constructing a consensus on the discourse and increasing the power of the international discourse. It is only by promoting the construction of Chinese Modernization Discourse that this discourse can be transformed from preliminary construction to mature and finalized as soon as possible.

    Late Modernization and Chinese Modernization
    Chen Xiyan, Sun Xiong
    2025, 41(4):  129-143. 
    Asbtract ( 29 )   HTML ( 0)   PDF (1137KB) ( 4 )  
    References | Related Articles | Metrics

    As a distinctive paradigm of modernization among late-developing nations, Chinese modernization embodies both the universal characteristics of global modernization and the unique particularities derived from its late-development attributes relative to early-developing countries. It manifests what may be termed as the late-development effects that are the shared features and inherent contradictions of belated modernization. Chinese characteristics are rooted in the nation’s unique historical trajectory, cultural traditions, and fundamental realities. Late-developing countries typically enjoy initial advantages such as low labor costs and opportunities for technological catch-up through external knowledge transfer. However, they concurrently confront multifaceted challenges, including difficulties in acquiring external resources, developmental dependency, mechanical imitation of foreign models divorced from local conditions, crises of cultural identity, deficiencies in intrinsic motivation to transcend traditional paradigms, and social instability during transitional phases. The Communist Party of China and the Chinese people, starting from their unique basic national conditions, have effectively leveraged their latecomer advantages, successfully addressed the difficulties associated with late development, rapidly narrowed the gap with early starter countries, and successfully advanced and expanded a catch-up and parallel approach to Chinese modernization.

    The Current and Future Path of the International Dissemination of Xi Jinping Thought On Culture
    Zhang Shuai
    2025, 41(4):  144-156. 
    Asbtract ( 31 )   HTML ( 2)   PDF (1142KB) ( 6 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    To truly exert its world influence, China’s dissemination of ideas must be internationalized. Advancing the international dissemination of Xi Jinping Thought On Culture is not only necessary to enhance the transmission and influence of modern Chinese civilization but also an essential part of creating a new form of human civilization and promoting global exchanges. Through systematic review of relevant reports from mainstream media in various countries, this paper analyzes the main sources of information, related topics, and reporting strategies in the international dissemination of Xi Jinping Thought On Culture. It is found that the sources of information mainly center around China's foreign language media, followed by American media, with multi-dimensional responses from media of other countries. Generally positive, the responses focus on people and the joint construction of a prosperous world culture. Asian media mainly discuss the interpretation of ideas, the path of practice, and attitude analysis. American, European, and African media convey a target judgment analysis. In terms of writing strategy, international media generally adopt a multi-perspective for positive reporting. However, there are a small number of distortions and deliberate misinterpretations through inappropriate associations. The research suggests that in the future, a cultural dissemination matrix should be used with the participation of multiple subjects. Multi-dimensional content should be used to construct cultural dissemination resources. Different strategies should be adopted to create a polyphonic effect of dissemination, thus building a more effective international dissemination system for Xi Jinping Thought On Culture in the international community.