Abstract:

As the carrier of daily life and the basic governance unit, the urban community has important value. Building community governance is an important theoretical and practical issue that requires urgent study. This paper clarifys the basic connotations of community governance by examining it through the “Ties-Relations-Norms” analytical framework and the QCA qualitative comparative analysis of 56 urban community governance cases. We found that under the “party and government thrust” and “system guarantee” some communities have formed endogenous governance communities. They are characterized by a “co governance platform” and “community self-organization”. Characteristics of an incubating community governance community are its “interest guidance” and “professional support”. A community governance community under stress is characterized by its “Scene urgency” under specific scenarios. At present, it is necessary to strengthen the endogeneity of community governance dynamics, structural embeddedness and institutional effectiveness. At the same time, differentiated strategies should be adopted depending on the community and its governance circumstances. The goal is to gradually form a community of community governance in the context of bond cohesion, relationship connections, and normative guarantees.

Key words: community governance, social Governance community, type characteristics, build path