Loading...
Welcome to Governance Studies ! Today is Share:
$ex.waitFor()

Table of Content

    15 May 2024, Volume 40 Issue 3
    People-centered algorithms: How to Understand “People” in the Governance Process
    He Yanling, Jiang liangzhu
    2024, 40(3):  4-23. 
    Asbtract ( 170 )   HTML ( 13)   PDF (1223KB) ( 261 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    Within the political discourse system, the core concept of “people” is characterized by its abstractness and integrity. During governance, it is typical to identify distinct groups through their hierarchical categorization and unique traits. Given the heterogeneity of these groups, achieving people-centered governance necessitates a precise definition of the diverse needs of various population segments within a given context. As a governance model, “People-centered algorithms” aim to integrate the “people-centered” value concept into the process of algorithmic governance. By accurately identifying and prioritizing the needs of diverse population segments, responses become timely and effective. The “People-centered algorithms” can be further subdivided into three primary categories: demand analysis, conflict resolution, and decision-making. These dimensions establish a precise connection between people's needs and policy provisions that construct a scientific and democratic governance framework. To incorporate the concept and model of “People-centered algorithms” into the Chinese path to modernization governance, attention must be paid to various population segments, including minorities, vulnerable participants, workers, representatives, and individuals. Adopting this approach ensures the achievement of people-centered, intelligent governance, and good governance.

    The Campaign-Style Governance: A Mobilization Mechanism with Chinese Characteristics
    Xiang Miao
    2024, 40(3):  24-33. 
    Asbtract ( 294 )   HTML ( 9)   PDF (950KB) ( 452 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    Campaign-style governance is rooted in traditional Chinese politics. It has also become the keyword of Chinese public administration with its widespread presence in contemporary Chinese national and local governance. There is a relationship between campaign-style governance mechanisms and hierarchical governance, which includes substitution, complementarity, and synergy. This association is an important experience in the revolution, construction, and development of contemporary China, reflecting the institutional advantages and governance effectiveness of Chinese state governance. However, campaign-style governance mechanisms also face the dilemma of effectiveness and the paradox of legitimacy caused by the layering of targets and the distortion of goals. A future pathway will embrace an institutionalized governance that is standardized, observe the rule of law, and focus on long-term effectiveness. Accordingly, campaign-style governance mechanisms will restrict public goals as well as provide technical, normative, and procedural constraints. Although campaign-style governance has distinctive Chinese characteristics, it is deeply related to bureaucratic governance, mobilization politics, and holistic governance. It has a wide range of applicability in both developing countries and developed countries. As both a theoretical concept and a governance mechanism, it is both country specific and universal regarding global public governance.

    The Bar Block Relationship: A Core Concept of China's Intergovernmental Relations
    Xu Dongtao
    2024, 40(3):  34-44. 
    Asbtract ( 536 )   HTML ( 23)   PDF (951KB) ( 2085 )  
    References | Related Articles | Metrics

    The bar block structure is the basic component of the Chinese government’s organizational system. The bar block relationship is a visual, conceptual, and theoretical expression of China's intergovernmental relations. It has inspired a surge in practical and theoretical research interest among China’s public management professionals. The evolution and development of the bar block relationship resonates with the construction and reform of the national system. Modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity will continue along with the concept of bar block relations as an important issue in government reform and public governance. For that reason, the connotations of bar block relations must be defined clearly, the main debates sorted out systematically, and the understanding of the regularity of bar block relations deepened. China’s independent knowledge system of public management requires interpreting the Chinese bar block relationship. Ideally, this analysis should not only be based on the history and reality of China's institutional structure and government reform practices. As such, it remains a universal theoretical concern for public management research. The bar block relationship may become more important in the practice and research of public management in China, contributing to the development of general theories of public management.

    The Construction of Collective-Choice Mechanism in Rural Governance——A Comparative Case Analysis Based on Two Villages in Jiangxi Province
    Wang Yahua, Liu Lu
    2024, 40(3):  45-60. 
    Asbtract ( 168 )   HTML ( 13)   PDF (1148KB) ( 270 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    The construction of effective rural governance rules is a key theoretical and practical task. However, the existing literature has yet to fully explore the hierarchical structure and design methods involved. In a multi-layered nested institutional rule system, the collective-choice mechanism links nested rule systems to improve rural governance performance. The design of a collective-choice mechanism requires three key elements: the interest compatibility arrangement, the democratic deliberation procedure, and the multi-actor monitoring system. A comparative case analysis of two villages in Jiangxi Province highlights the key role of the collective-choice mechanism in rural governance and explores the specific ways to construct a collective-choice mechanism. This institutional analysis of a collective-choice mechanism contributes new insights into the modernization of the rural governance system under the joint governance of the state and society, and also enriches public governance theories with Chinese wisdom.

    Can Party Building Guidance Crack the Code of China’s Grassroots Governance?—— Based on the Practice of Nansha District of Guangzhou City
    Zhu Yapeng, Yi Min, Cui Yuxin
    2024, 40(3):  61-78. 
    Asbtract ( 138 )   HTML ( 5)   PDF (1184KB) ( 200 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    China's grassroots governance must effectively allocate resources, authorities, and incentives. To do so, the grassroots must full give play to the central role of party building to find the key to improving the effectiveness of grassroots governance. The paper draws on the theory of organizational change to build an analytical framework. Using the practice of reforming grassroots governance led by the Party in Nansha District, Guangzhou City, we found that the Party lead a series of measures for informatization construction, process reengineering, structural adjustment, mechanism design, and cultural reshaping. These measures formed three paths: organization building, authority synergy, and incentive drive. These pathways helped solve the commonly faced problems in grassroots governance and promoted an overall change in China's grassroots governance pattern. To promote grassroots social governance reform, we can draw on the basic logics of “creative destruction” and holistic governance to impel the service process of grassroots organizations and inter-organizational synergy. This will help reshape the pattern of good grassroots governance in China.

    The Driving Logic and Mechanism Design of Social Organizations Promoting Common Prosperity-A Study Based on the Demonstration Zone for Common Prosperity in Zhejiang
    Shen Yongdong, Lai Yixuan, Gu Xin
    2024, 40(3):  79-94. 
    Asbtract ( 123 )   HTML ( 4)   PDF (1226KB) ( 232 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    The policy design or practical impact of multiple mechanisms to promote common prosperity has received more attention. However, researchers have focused on the role of government-based administrative mechanisms and enterprise-based market mechanisms. What remains neglected is the different driving logics, mechanism designs, and specific roles of social organizations as the primary community mechanisms to promote common prosperity. This study took as a its research subject the high-quality construction of a common prosperity demonstration area in Zhejiang. We conducted a theoretical analysis using a “systematical logic driving - multiple mechanisms complementary embedding - multidisciplinary roles playing” framework of the driving logic and internal mechanisms of social organizations in promoting common prosperity. Our findings indicate that: (1) social organizations' advancement of common prosperity is steered by various institutional logics, including government logic, market logic, and community logic; (2) diverse blends of institutional logics impact the varied roles that social organizations play in different aspects of common prosperity, such as economic growth, income distribution, and social management; and, (3) social organizations' contributions to common prosperity are achieved through the integrated use of multiple mechanisms. At the theoretical level, this study enhances the research on social organizations as the primary entity in the integrated use of multiple mechanisms to promote common prosperity. At the practical level, the study's findings offer valuable insights for social organizations seeking to advance common prosperity in China.

    Can Provincial-Directly Managed County Reforms Promote Common Prosperity?——An Empirical Analysis Based on the Difference-in-Differences Model
    Zhou Gongman
    2024, 40(3):  95-110. 
    Asbtract ( 111 )   HTML ( 8)   PDF (1061KB) ( 114 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    The reform of provincial-managed counties is regarded as a crucial measure for economic development that narrows the urban-rural divide. However, the existing research has not conclusively shown whether it reduces the “three major” disparities and advances the equalization of public services, two key policy goals for achieving common prosperity. This paper uses panel data from the reform of Zhejiang province's provincial-managed counties from 1997 to 2017. By applying the difference-in-differences method, the paper examines the overall impact of these reforms on achieving the primary policy objectives of common prosperity. The findings suggest that both the pilot and full implementation phases of the reforms had a positive effect on common prosperity, showing an increasing trend over time. Further analysis reveals regional differences in these positive effects. The “three major” provincial-managed county pilot programs displayed characteristics of “the weak becoming stronger, the strong getting stronger.” The “full implementation” phase demonstrated features of “suppressing the strong to support the weak, and promoting collaborative development.” These findings have significant implications for optimizing the provincial county management system and exploring innovative policy paths to achieving common prosperity.

    Adaptive Governance Research: Status and Future Prospects
    Rong Zhi, Tan Xiaofang
    2024, 40(3):  111-126. 
    Asbtract ( 375 )   HTML ( 13)   PDF (1294KB) ( 3302 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    With the expansion and deepening of human activities on ecosystems, adaptive governance has become an emerging governance mode to deal with the characteristics of multi-stability, non-linear, uncertainty, integrity, and complexity of complex systems. Adaptive governance is based on the theories of ecological resilience and self-organization. Its most prominent features are in its development-oriented concept and dynamic adaptability. It also has many realization paths, including core concepts such as multi-center and multi-level governance system, social network, and social learning. Adaptive governance in China arrived late and has not yet formed a theoretical system. Therefore, it is necessary to establish an adaptive governance system in line with China's politics, economy, and culture, by focusing on the nation’s experience. At the same time, adaptive governance research is also expanding to other fields, so we need to be cautious in the process of learning.

    Regional Party Building Integration Drives Cross-Regional Coordinated Governance: Mechanism and Practical Framework——Research based on the practice of integration in the Yangtze River Delta Region
    Kan Daoyuan, Yang Ning
    2024, 40(3):  127-141. 
    Asbtract ( 103 )   HTML ( 6)   PDF (1026KB) ( 253 )  
    Figures and Tables | References | Related Articles | Metrics

    As the promoter and leader of regional integration, the CPC plays a central role in cross-regional governance. It provides a strong political guarantee for breaking down barriers between regions and between organizations, achieving regional cooperation and optimization through the allocation of resources. In recent years, the Yangtze River Delta region has promoted cross-regional governance communities through cross-regional Party building communities. This exploration of a new type of Party building model called “regional Party building integration” covers a variety of practical forms. The existing research theoretical analysis perspectives are insufficient. In this article, the focus is on the “Party” and the theoretical interpretation of the concept of “regional Party building integration.” The study’s analytical model of “Party-driven cross-regional collaborative governance” reveals the mechanism and practical framework for driving cross-regional collaborative governance. This analytical model reveals that regional Party building integrates the public authority system, organizational network system, and resource sharing system of multiple entities. Thus, it becomes the “driving force” for cross-regional collaborative governance and achieves regional integrative development. The mechanism of regional Party building integration provides structural support in terms of target allocation, relationship networks, and rule systems. It also provides action support in terms of political leadership, ideological guidance, information communication, and resource supply. This framework of regional Party building integration forms a multi-level network through organizational construction. The purpose is to achieve overall guidance and promotion through coordinated integration and to form an open cycle process through collaborative links. The actual significance of regional Party building integration is not just to provide a practical framework for cross-regional collaborative governance. It is also to provide a system arrangement for achieving regional modernization and driving forward the Chinese path to modernization.

    Artificial Intelligence-assisted Sentencing System
    Zheng Haiwei, Lai Lina, Zhang Yining
    2024, 40(3):  142-156. 
    Asbtract ( 118 )   HTML ( 6)   PDF (1033KB) ( 295 )  
    References | Related Articles | Metrics

    An intelligent judiciary is possible through the gradual integration of artificial intelligence sentencing systems into trial activities, aiming to achieve consistency in sentencing for similar cases. However, beyond the practical level, there are concerns about judicial fairness and ethics; boundaries need to be established. A multifaceted approach is essential, encompassing philosophical, institutional, and technological aspects. At the philosophical level, external expansion of application boundaries should be considered. Institutionally, reasonable limitations on application boundaries are crucial. Technologically, efforts should focus on unlocking the system's potential within the existing boundaries. Furthermore, the application of artificial intelligence sentencing systems should primarily aim to enhance judicial efficiency rather than solely promoting judicial fairness.